When to Use a Psychologist Consultant in Litigation
| 2025 Update
Important Disclaimer: The non-testifying consultant role described in this article is entirely separate from court-appointed evaluation services. Dr. Long & Associates never serves in both roles in the same matter. All consulting work strictly adheres to ethical boundaries for non-testifying experts, maintaining clear separation between neutral evaluation and consultation services.
How Privileged Psychological Expertise Can Enhance Your Legal Strategy
Attorneys facing complex litigation involving psychological factors often focus solely on securing an expert witness for testimony. However, the most sophisticated legal teams recognize that non-testifying forensic psychology consultants provide strategic advantages that testifying experts simply cannot offer due to ethical constraints and disclosure requirements. This privileged consultative relationship enables attorneys to develop stronger cases while maintaining full attorney-client privilege.
Dr. Long & Associates now provides this specialized non-testifying consultant service nationwide through PSYPACT telehealth authorization across 42 states and jurisdictions, bringing high-level forensic psychological strategy to legal teams regardless of geographic location.
Understanding the Three Distinct Roles of Forensic Psychologists in Legal Proceedings
To appreciate the unique value of non-testifying consultants, it's essential to understand how this role differs from other forensic psychology services:
1. Court-Appointed Evaluator
Serves as a neutral third party
Appointed by the court or by stipulation of parties
Conducts comprehensive evaluations including interviews and testing
Submits findings directly to the court
Must maintain strict objectivity and impartiality
Cannot engage in strategy discussions with either side
2. Retained Expert Witness
Hired by one party but must maintain strict neutrality and objectivity
Primary obligation is to the court and professional standards, not the retaining attorney
Conducts impartial evaluations based on comprehensive data collection
Forms opinions independent of the desired outcome of the retaining party
Subject to full discovery, deposition, and cross-examination
All opinions, methods, data, and communications generally discoverable
Cannot engage in strategic discussions about case presentation or advocacy
Ethically required to acknowledge limitations and alternative explanations
Important Note: While attorneys sometimes wish to use the same professional for both expert testimony and strategic consultation, these roles fundamentally conflict. A testifying expert who has participated in strategy sessions faces serious ethical and evidentiary challenges. Courts may disqualify experts or consider their testimony compromised if they have functioned in both roles. Understanding this distinction is crucial for maintaining both admissibility and credibility of psychological evidence.
3. Non-Testifying Consultant (Strategic Asset)
Works exclusively under attorney-client privilege
Provides strategic guidance without the constraints of potential testimony
Not subject to discovery or deposition (with proper case management)
Can assist directly with case strategy and advocacy approaches
Helps attorneys understand psychological aspects without public disclosure
Reviews opposing expert work with critical analysis not possible for testifying experts
Maintains proper professional ethics while maximizing strategic value
Need a court-ordered psychological evaluation but unsure what type fits your case?
We provide forensic psychological evaluations across family, criminal, and civil matters, including parental fitness, competency, risk, trauma, and more.
In addition to formal evaluations, we offer both expert witness testimony and non-testifying forensic psychology consultation to attorneys nationwide—ensuring full strategic support at every stage of litigation.
👉 Explore Our Court-Ordered Psychological Evaluation Services
👉 Request a Consultation Here
Why Leading Attorneys Utilize Non-Testifying Forensic Psychology Consultants
The non-testifying consultant role provides valuable psychological expertise to support legal strategy in ways distinct from testifying experts:
1. Critical Analysis of Opposing Experts
While testifying experts must maintain a careful balance in critiquing colleagues, non-testifying consultants can:
Conduct detailed methodological critiques of opposing evaluations
Identify potential bias in assessment selection, administration, or interpretation
Evaluate whether opposing experts adhered to professional standards
Analyze whether conclusions actually follow from the data presented
Develop targeted questions for effective and methodologically sound cross-examination
2. Case Strategy Development
Non-testifying consultants provide privileged insights that inform legal strategy:
Conduct a comprehensive review of psychological, medical, educational, and legal records to identify relevant information or patterns that may not have been previously emphasized or integrated into the case theory
Identify psychological aspects relevant to case analysis
Help attorneys understand complex psychological concepts relevant to the case
Translate psychological research into practical legal applications
Develop evidence-based psychological frameworks that align with factual evidence
Evaluate case strengths and weaknesses through a psychological lens
3. Enhanced Preparation for Psychological Testimony
Preparation involving a non-testifying consultant dramatically improves how psychological evidence is handled:
Provide education on psychological principles relevant to the specific case
Help attorneys anticipate and counter opposing psychological arguments
Develop psychologically-informed direct and cross-examination questions
Identify documentation that supports or challenges psychological claims
Prepare attorneys to effectively challenge improper psychological testimony
4. Client Triage and Proactive Intervention Planning
Early engagement of a non-testifying consultant enables attorneys to implement strategic intervention plans that can significantly impact case outcomes:
Identify psychological issues requiring immediate attention before they become courtroom liabilities
Recommend appropriate therapeutic interventions tailored to the client's specific needs and case context
Create a documented history of proactive remediation that courts view favorably
Develop treatment plans addressing specific concerns likely to arise in court proceedings
Guide selection of appropriate treatment providers who understand legal implications
Transform potentially negative psychological factors into evidence of responsibility and rehabilitation
Strategic Advantage: Courts consistently give significant weight to parties who demonstrate proactive steps toward addressing psychological concerns. Unfortunately, many attorneys wait until court-appointed evaluations occur—ceding control of this crucial narrative. By engaging a non-testifying consultant early, attorneys can implement appropriate interventions immediately, demonstrating client commitment to addressing issues before they're highlighted by opposing experts or court appointees.
Case Example: In a family court matter involving substance use allegations, early consultant involvement led to implementation of an appropriate treatment plan six months before court proceedings began. The documented history of proactive intervention significantly influenced the judge's final custody determination, as it demonstrated parental insight and commitment to child wellbeing that the opposing party could not match.
5. Strategic Expert Witness Selection and Preparation
A skilled non-testifying forensic consultant often reduces the need for a retained expert witness altogether, particularly in cases where the psychological issues can be effectively addressed through informed pleadings, focused cross-examination, or legally sound argument. This can translate to significant savings of time, resources, and litigation expense, while still ensuring that psychological elements are handled with expert-level precision.
Non-testifying consultants provide the behind-the-scenes expertise needed to develop arguments and questions grounded in scientifically credible, Daubert-admissible concepts, without prematurely escalating the case with expert disclosures. When an expert witness is warranted, the consultant ensures the right one is selected, prepared, and aligned with the case strategy.
They contribute to this process by:
Identifying the most appropriate type of mental health expert based on the specific psycholegal issues involved
Vetting potential experts through review of their credentials, past testimony, publications, and methodological orientation
Ensuring that any testimony presented will be grounded in accepted scientific principles and withstand admissibility scrutiny
Helping attorneys evaluate whether expert involvement is necessary at all—and if so, how to use testimony strategically rather than reflexively
Preparing retained experts to address relevant data, consider alternative explanations, and anticipate challenges to their conclusions
Bridging communication between the legal team and psychological professionals to maintain alignment between litigation strategy and forensic methodology
Case Examples: Non-Testifying Consultation in Action
In a high-conflict custody case, a non-testifying consultant identified critical flaws in the opposing psychologist's parent-child observation methodology, including confirmation bias and failure to follow standardized protocols. This analysis led to devastating cross-examination that significantly diminished the impact of the opposing expert's testimony.
Criminal Defense
For a complex criminal case involving mental health considerations, a non-testifying consultant helped defense counsel understand the limitations of a prosecution expert's PTSD assessment, including methodology questions and cultural factors that warranted consideration. This guidance supported informed cross-examination that appropriately addressed the scientific limitations of the assessment.
Civil Litigation
In a psychological injury case, a non-testifying consultant identified that the opposing expert had interpreted standardized test results in ways that warranted further examination and had not fully explored alternative causation explanations. This insight allowed the attorney to address these methodological considerations during cross-examination, leading to a more balanced understanding of the evidence.
The Dr. Long Difference: Nationwide Forensic Consultation Through PSYPACT
Dr. Lisa Long brings exceptional qualifications to the non-testifying consultant role, including:
Extensive experience as chief forensic psychologist at a maximum-security forensic hospital
Completion of hundreds of competency, criminal responsibility, and risk assessments
Department of Defense experience conducting evaluations in international contexts
Expert testimony in federal courts and military proceedings
Deep understanding of both clinical and forensic psychological assessment
Specialized training in forensic testing protocols and methodology
Through PSYPACT authorization, Dr. Long now provides non-testifying consultation services to attorneys nationwide, bringing this specialized expertise to legal teams regardless of location. This remote consultation capability allows for:
Confidential video consultations with legal teams
Secure document review and analysis
Strategic planning sessions with attorneys
Assistance with deposition and cross-examination preparation
Expert guidance throughout case development
Ethical Boundaries in Non-Testifying Consultation
While non-testifying consultants operate under attorney-client privilege, important ethical boundaries remain central to our practice:
Consultants must maintain professional integrity and accuracy in analyzing psychological data
All guidance remains evidence-based and grounded in scientific literature and professional standards
The role focuses on educating attorneys about valid psychological principles and methodologically sound critique
Consultation emphasizes factual analysis rather than advocacy positions
Proper case management is essential to maintain privilege and role separation
Role Separation Commitment: Dr. Long & Associates maintains strict separation between evaluation and consultation roles. We never serve as both a neutral evaluator and consultant in the same matter, and we carefully manage our professional activities to prevent any potential conflicts.
How to Engage Dr. Long as a Non-Testifying Consultant
The most effective non-testifying consultation relationships begin early in case development. To engage Dr. Long & Associates:
Initial Consultation: Schedule a confidential discussion about your case needs
Engagement Agreement: Establish clear parameters for the consultative relationship
Case Materials Review: Provide relevant documents for psychological analysis
Strategy Development: Collaborate on psychological aspects of case strategy
Ongoing Support: Receive guidance throughout case preparation and proceedings
Non-testifying consultation services are available for family law, criminal defense, civil litigation, and specialized proceedings nationwide through secure PSYPACT telehealth authorization.
Maximize Your Case Strategy with Expert Psychological Consultation
The strategic advantage of a non-testifying forensic psychology consultant can dramatically strengthen your legal position while maintaining full attorney-client privilege. Dr. Long's specialized expertise is now available to legal teams across 42 states and jurisdictions, providing sophisticated psychological guidance without geographic limitations. 👉 Request a Consultation Here